Member Profile: Mike Playfair
Member Since: 2008
South Australia, Australia
Physiological Details |
Height: |
N/A |
Resting Heartrate: |
N/A |
Current Weight: |
N/A |
Maximum Heartrate: |
N/A |
Favourites |
Food: |
|
Drink: |
|
Holiday: |
|
Super Hero: |
|
Music: |
|
Movie: |
|
Bike Details |
Frame: |
|
Wheels: |
|
Groupset: |
|
Pedals: |
|
Bike Weight: |
|
Latest Times
02 Jul 2006:
Old Belair Road
- 9mins 27secs
19 Feb 2006:
The old freeway
- 28mins 0secs
05 Feb 2005:
Cement Hill
- 10mins 40secs
25 Oct 2004:
Old Belair Road
- 9mins 46secs
25 Oct 2004:
Old Belair Road
- 9mins 46secs
View All »
No Circuit Times
Saved Courses
Circuits & Hill Climbs saved by this rider:
No saved courses.
Comments
Mike commented on his own time: "During Coast-to-Coast, so left lane of carriageway was available instead of the bike track. May have made it easier bx the bike track looks more up/down.... but on the other hand I was having to negotiate around heaps of people."
Mike commented on his own time: "ouch"
Mike commented on his own time: "ouch"
Mike commented on his own time: "thought this list was getting too long.
A 45 yr old commuter on a 1982 Raleigh tourer complete with pannier & laptop PC(hence 17kg bike weight) did this.
If you're going to post something slower, you probably deserve the ragging your mates will give you."
Forum Posts
27 Oct 2008 10:33 AM posted in Optimum cadence?
I believe it's tied to the physiology of the person. I figure that among the factors are the ratio of fast-twitch & slow-twitch muscle fibres in that rider's makeup. Ulrich & Armstrong have spent huge amounts of time finding their optimums, and there's a very obvious difference in their cadences. . . . but they're both being really efficient.
Marketplace
No items for sale!